------------------------------------------
This message has been cross-posted to both the Risk Professionals and the Enterprise Risk Management E-Groups.
------------------------------------------
Has anyone looked into the distinction between, and application of, dashboards vs scorecards? It seems the use described here is a scorecard: keeping track of performance, or a historical view.
On the other hand, the concept of a dashboard is to provide information that guides forward actions. This implies the dashboard information must be close to real-time, and provides directional as well as rate of change indication.
-------------------------------
John Brown
The Coca-Cola Company
Risk Manager, Technical Stewardship Operations Support
-------------------------------
Original Message-----
Sent: August 12, 2008 09:31
Subject: RE: Risk Management Dashboard reporting
We've looked at a number of different systems but we use Crystal Xcelsius as our software program. This one is similiar to Excel in that we enter the data directly into the system and tell it what to do. There are other systems out there that, once they are set up, automatically pull the
data from different databases and provide continual real time information. This was much more than
we needed. We update our Executive Team quarterly (or more frequently if there is some specific point I want to make).
For our organization's culture I focus primarily on the pro-active metrics - such as training and % of open/closed audit items. We also include financial metrics (such as
total cost of risk vs budget) and historical metrics (such as types of losses by severity or frequency).
-------------------------------
John Lammey
University of Ottawa
Associate Director, Risk and Insurance
-------------------------------